Re: Cygwin cleanup
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Cygwin cleanup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+hUKGJ=jTuW=i4Yjfr6RRczepWthBA+jRRLP9pt4jXWeAnOeg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Cygwin cleanup (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Cygwin cleanup
Re: Cygwin cleanup Re: Cygwin cleanup |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 3:38 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote: > [train wreck] Oh my, so I'm getting the impression we might actually be totally unstable on Cygwin. Which surprises me because ... wait a minute ... lorikeet isn't even running most of the tests. So... we don't really know the degree to which any of this works at all? > This shows that it *can* pass, if slowly, and infrequently: > https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6546858536337408 Ok, that's slightly reassuring, so maybe we *can* fix this, but I'm one step closer to what Tom said, re wasting developer time... > [lots of improvements] Cool. > Why did you write "|| exit /b 1" in all the bash invocations ? I think cirrus > handles that automatically. Cargo-culted from libarchive.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: