Re: Direct I/O
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Direct I/O |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+hUKGJ407fP_0+aQ_FZQjTMpu=qQ8XyrfBtYzUTMWUMFp7FOA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Direct I/O (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 5:48 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 3:04 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 2:56 PM Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> wrote: > > > I'm hitting a panic in t_004_io_direct. The build is running on > > > overlayfs on tmpfs/ext4 (upper/lower) which is probably a weird > > > combination but has worked well for building everything over the last > > > decade. On Debian unstable: After trying a couple of things and doing some googling, it looks like it's tmpfs that rejects it, not overlayfs, so I'd adjust that commit message slightly. Of course it's a completely reasonable thing to expect the tests to pass (or in this case be skipped) in a tmpfs, eg /tmp on some distributions. (It's a strange to contemplate what O_DIRECT means for tmpfs, considering that it *is* the page cache, kinda, and I see people have been arguing about that for a couple of decades since O_DIRECT was added to Linux; doesn't seem that helpful to me that it rejects it, but 🤷).
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: