Re: Parallel Full Hash Join
| От | Thomas Munro |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Parallel Full Hash Join |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+hUKGJ3GwiPpQbfuw6o9YyEzE0CA6fO9qoOEVK-vrfVJCChBw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Parallel Full Hash Join (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 11:33 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 02:19:54PM -0400, Melanie Plageman wrote: > > Another worker attached to the batch barrier, saw that it was in > > PHJ_BATCH_SCAN, marked it done and detached. This is fine. > > BarrierArriveAndDetachExceptLast() is meant to ensure no one waits > > (deadlock hazard) and that at least one worker stays to do the unmatched > > scan. It doesn't hurt anything for another worker to join and find out > > there is no work to do. > > > > We should simply delete this assertion. Agreed, and pushed. Thanks! > I have added an open item about that. This had better be tracked. Thanks, will update.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: