Re: increase size of pg_commit_ts buffers
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: increase size of pg_commit_ts buffers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+hUKG+zUv0XPdM53YVmAUOVi6sj+VbdrF1UubS=JA_ULWyNtg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: increase size of pg_commit_ts buffers (Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: increase size of pg_commit_ts buffers
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 11:56 PM Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> wrote: > > 16 янв. 2021 г., в 03:07, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> написал(а): > > Andrey Borodin already has a patch to change the behavior for > > multixact, which is something we should perhaps also do. I now notice > > that they're also reporting a bug in that thread ... sigh > > I've tried in that thread [0] to do more intelligent optimisation than just increase number of buffers. > Though, in fact bigger memory had dramatically better effect that lock tricks. > > Maybe let's make all SLRUs buffer sizes configurable? +1 I got interested in the SLRU sizing problem (the lock trick and CV stuff sounds interesting too, but I didn't have time to review that in this cycle). The main problem I'm aware of with it is the linear search, so I tried to fix that. See Andrey's thread for details.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: