Re: Replication & recovery_min_apply_delay
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Replication & recovery_min_apply_delay |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+hUKG+ydu5yfT9G70j7sT-4s4q3gtCZxm5UG2E0+K1-rry48A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Replication & recovery_min_apply_delay (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Replication & recovery_min_apply_delay
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 3:34 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2019-Jan-30, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote: > > I wonder if it can be considered as acceptable solution of the problem or > > there can be some better approach? > > I didn't find one. It sounds like you are in agreement that there is a problem and this is the best solution. I didn't look at these patches, I'm just asking with my Commitfest manager hat on: did I understand correctly, does this need a TAP test, possibly the one Alvaro posted, and if so, could we please have a fresh patch that includes the test, so we can see it passing the test in CI? -- Thomas Munro https://enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: