Re: [PATCH] remove pg_standby
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] remove pg_standby |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+hUKG+yNF2WNwKjE1NUesVHQt=5pXTBF2u2F9ZJDG72MzJsKg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] remove pg_standby (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] remove pg_standby
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:36 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 05:08:56PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > > But one question is; shouldn't we follow "usual" way to retire the > > feature instead of dropping that immediately? That is, mark > > pg_standby as obsolete, announce that pg_standby will be dropped > > after several releases, and then drop pg_standby. This seems safe > > because there might be some users. While it's been marked as > > obsolete, maybe WAL prefetch feature doesn't work with pg_standby, > > but we can live with that because it's obsolete. > > Thanks. FWIW, at this stage, my take is just to move on and remove > it. If we mark that as obsolete, it will stay around forever while > annoying future development. I agree. Also, this thing is entirely separate from the server, so a hypothetical user who really wants to upgrade to 14 but keep using pg_standby a bit longer could always use the version that shipped with 13.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: