Re: Collation version tracking for macOS

On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 7:38 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 1:55 PM Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> > I realize your patch is experimental, but when there is a better
> > consensus on the approach, we should consider adding declarative syntax
> > such as:
> >
> >    CREATE COLLATION (or LOCALE?) PROVIDER icu67
> >      TYPE icu VERSION '67' AS '/path/to/icui18n.so.67';
> >
> > It will offer more opportunities to catch errors early and offer better
> > error messages. It would also enable it to function if the library is
> > built with --disable-renaming (though we'd have to trust the user).
>
> Earlier in this and other threads, we wondered if each ICU major version should
> be a separate provider, which is what you're showing there, or should be an
> independent property of an individual COLLATION, which is what v6 did with
> '63:en' and what Peter suggested I make more formal with CREATE COLLATION foo
> (..., ICU_VERSION=63).  I actually started out thinking we'd have multiple
> providers, but I couldn't really think of any advantage, and I think it makes
> some upgrade scenarios more painful.  Can you elaborate on why you'd want
> that model?

Hmm, thinking some more about this... I said the above thinking that
you couldn't change a provider after creating a database/collation.
But what if you could?

1.  CREATE DATABASE x LOCALE_PROVIDER=icu ...;
2.  Some time later after an upgrade, my postgres binary is linked
against a new ICU version and I start seeing warnings.
3.  ALTER DATABASE x LOCALE_PROVIDER=icu63;

I suppose you shouldn't be allowed to change libc -> icu, but you
could change icu - > icuXXX, or I guess icuXXX -> icuXXX.

What if you didn't have to manually manage the set of available
providers with DDL like you showed, but we just automatically
supported "icu" (= the linked ICU, whatever it might be), and icu50 up
to icuXXX where XXX is the linked ICU's version?  We can encode those
values + libc as an int, to replace the existing char the represents
providers in catalogues.

That's basically just a different way of encoding the same information
that Peter was suggesting I put in a new catalogue attribute.  How do
you like that bikeshed colour?