Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+hUKG+oFsGCN3HkG_-_U9fKqpQkL48RZ-0AKg7H5biLnXC76A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~ (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bump MIN_WINNT to 0x0600 (Vista) as minimal runtime in 16~
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 12:29 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 08:11:09PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > Based on what I can see, the Windows animals seem to have digested > > 47bd0b3 (cygwin, MinGW and MSVC), so I think that we are good. Great, that's a lot of nice cleanup. > The last part that's worth adjusting is ldap_start_tls_sA(), which > would lead to the attached simplification. - if ((r = _ldap_start_tls_sA(*ldap, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL)) != LDAP_SUCCESS) + if ((r = ldap_start_tls_sA(*ldap, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL)) != LDAP_SUCCESS) When looking the function up it made sense to use the name ending in '...A', but when calling directly I think we shouldn't use the A suffix, we should let the <winldap.h> macros do that for us[1]. (I wondered for a moment if that would even make Windows and Unix code the same, but sadly not due to the extra NULL arguments.) [1] https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/winldap/nf-winldap-ldap_start_tls_sa
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: