Re: "ERROR: latch already owned" on gharial
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "ERROR: latch already owned" on gharial |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+hUKG+YuSJzKtJkGaXnD+JpZ0MFB5RBdhHK9_VOgzOVSSNyWA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: "ERROR: latch already owned" on gharial (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: "ERROR: latch already owned" on gharial
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 2:35 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes: > > On a more practical note, I don't have access to the BF database right > > now. Would you mind checking if "latch already owned" has occurred on > > any other animals? > > Looking back 6 months, these are the only occurrences of that string > in failed tests: > > sysname | branch | snapshot | stage | l > ---------+--------+---------------------+----------------+------------------------------------------------------------------- > gharial | HEAD | 2022-04-28 23:37:51 | Check | 2022-04-28 18:36:26.981 MDT [22642:1] ERROR: latch alreadyowned > gharial | HEAD | 2022-05-06 11:33:11 | IsolationCheck | 2022-05-06 10:10:52.727 MDT [7366:1] ERROR: latch already owned > gharial | HEAD | 2022-05-24 06:31:31 | IsolationCheck | 2022-05-24 02:44:51.850 MDT [13089:1] ERROR: latch alreadyowned > (3 rows) Thanks. Hmm. So far it's always a parallel worker. The best idea I have is to include the ID of the mystery PID in the error message and see if that provides a clue next time.
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: