Re: Relation bulk write facility
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Relation bulk write facility |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+hUKG+NO4-1Fbg9+-DQEekqeLtcwGm9KNGyBTW3HiReY9vnwg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Relation bulk write facility (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Relation bulk write facility
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 9:12 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 8:50 AM Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: > > On GNU/Linux x64, gcc correctly records alignment=2**12 for the associated > > section (.rodata for bulk_write.o zero_buffer, .bss for pg_prewarm.o > > blockbuffer). If I'm reading this right, neither AIX gcc nor xlc is marking > > the section with sufficient alignment, in bulk_write.o or pg_prewarm.o: > > Ah, that is a bit of a hazard that we should probably document. > > I guess the ideas to fix this would be: use smgrzeroextend() instead > of this coding, and/or perhaps look at the coding of pg_pwrite_zeros() > (function-local static) for any other place that needs such a thing, > if it would be satisfied by function-local scope? Erm, wait, how does that function-local static object work differently?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: