Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+hUKG+34K1V9y3HLH4zCT8T4N=EZw6UcTYA48U9ebWPXnET0g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~? (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?
Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 4:26 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > I have not gone back to this part yet, though I plan to do so. As we > are at the beginning of the development cycle, I have applied the > patch to remove support for 1.0.1 for now on HEAD. Let's see what the > buildfarm tells. curculio (OpenBSD 5.9) is failing with "undefined reference to `X509_get_signature_nid'", but that's OK, Mikael already supplied a modern OpenBSD system to replace it (schnauzer, which is green) and he was planning to shut curculio down (see Direct I/O thread where that came up because its GCC 4.2 compiler doesn't understand our stack alignment directives; it will also break comprehensively when I push the nearby all-supported-computers-have-locale_t patch from the check_strxfrm_bug thread).
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: