Re: small improvement of the elapsed time for truncating heap in vacuum
От | Masahiko Sawada |
---|---|
Тема | Re: small improvement of the elapsed time for truncating heap in vacuum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+fd4k7MA3iFQr4qzvaQ_HH_HJdYgvxsTuox5pFcJATnL3R3og@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: small improvement of the elapsed time for truncating heap in vacuum (Kasahara Tatsuhito <kasahara.tatsuhito@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: small improvement of the elapsed time for truncating heap in vacuum
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 at 12:44, Kasahara Tatsuhito <kasahara.tatsuhito@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 4:50 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > > Regarding the patch, isn't it better to put pg_rusage_init() at the > > top of do loop block? If we do this, as a side-effect, we can get > > rid of pg_rusage_init() at the top of lazy_truncate_heap(). > Thanks for your reply. > Yeah, it makes sense. > > Attached patch moves pg_rusage_init() to the top of do-loop-block. +1 to reset for each truncation loops. For the patch, we can put also the declaration of ru0 into the loop. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: