Re: logical copy_replication_slot issues
От | Masahiko Sawada |
---|---|
Тема | Re: logical copy_replication_slot issues |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+fd4k5qWBLTqomDxfeEeLR-yBf9_+EHxfFcpnP8hc7Bg15OEg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: logical copy_replication_slot issues (Arseny Sher <a.sher@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: logical copy_replication_slot issues
Re: logical copy_replication_slot issues |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 6 Mar 2020 at 20:02, Arseny Sher <a.sher@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > > I wrote: > > > It looks good to me now. > > After lying for some time in my head it reminded me that > CreateInitDecodingContext not only pegs the LSN, but also xmin, so > attached makes a minor comment correction. > > While taking a look at the nearby code it seemed weird to me that > GetOldestSafeDecodingTransactionId checks PGXACT->xid, not xmin. Don't > want to investigate this at the moment though, and not for this thread. > > Also not for this thread, but I've noticed > pg_copy_logical_replication_slot doesn't allow to change plugin name > which is an omission in my view. It would be useful and trivial to do. > Thank you for updating the patch. The patch looks basically good to me but I have a few questions: /* - * Create logical decoding context, to build the initial snapshot. + * Create logical decoding context to find start point or, if we don't + * need it, to 1) bump slot's restart_lsn and xmin 2) check plugin sanity. */ Do we need to numbering that despite not referring them? ctx = CreateInitDecodingContext(plugin, NIL, - false, /* do not build snapshot */ + false, /* do not build data snapshot */ restart_lsn, logical_read_local_xlog_page, NULL, NULL, NULL); I'm not sure this change makes the comment better. Could you elaborate on the motivation of this change? Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: