Re: BUG #8628: md5 security hole
От | Francisco Olarte |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #8628: md5 security hole |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+bJJbyXbMgWnTfy9C7dDomWP38XPhtKoXaMzX78vvErssob8w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #8628: md5 security hole (rob@northleaf.com) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Hi Rob_ On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 5:49 PM, <rob@northleaf.com> wrote: > I am able to login without a password when the password field is null. If > the field is not null the functionality seems normal, I get rejected unless > the password is correct. This makes password based login ridiculous. Is > this a bug or designed in? I login with my own code (Qt based) or with > pgAdmin III and I find the same bug. Is it not possible to require a > password at login? I doubt a bug like that would have remain uncovered for a long time, so this has a strong PEBKAC smell. What do you mean by 'the password field' ? The only similar thing which I would describe as a 'password field' in a databaseis the pg_authid.rolpasswd column, which is described as 'Password (possibly encrypted); null if none.', which would give something which could be easily interpreted as what you are reporting, making the behaviour you describe exactly the documented one and your report a misinterpreted pilot error. Maybe if you add a little more detail and do a little legwork before making such a strong statement someone can help you. Regards. Francisco Olarte.
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: