Re: [GENERAL] pg_restore to a port where nobody is listening?
От | Francisco Olarte |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] pg_restore to a port where nobody is listening? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+bJJby10zJV90QDqMs4LHOTKj_1gw7ETb7_TKhPQHydvLu_bQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [GENERAL] pg_restore to a port where nobody is listening? (Daniel Westermann <daniel.westermann@dbi-services.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Daniel Westermann <daniel.westermann@dbi-services.com> wrote: > I have a PostgreSQL 9.5.4 and a PostgreSQL 9.6.1 instance installed on the > same host. .... ..... > What do I miss? I can give any port to pg_restore and it just seems to be > fine. mmmm, are you by chance using debian/ubuntu/any derivative? Maybe pg_restore is not directly executed. In Ubuntu I have this: $ type -path pg_restore /usr/bin/pg_restore $ file /usr/bin/pg_restore /usr/bin/pg_restore: symbolic link to ../share/postgresql-common/pg_wrapper $ file /usr/share/postgresql-common/pg_wrapper /usr/share/postgresql-common/pg_wrapper: Perl script text executable And that pg_wrapper thingie has the habit of completely fscking my connection options / service files ( even though I do not have a server installed, I only install teh client programs to connect to the remote servers ). You could check with type/file wether you have something similar. Francisco Olarte.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: