Re: libpq heartbeat
От | Francisco Olarte |
---|---|
Тема | Re: libpq heartbeat |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+bJJbxoMSvN3F1V1m__Xpfkc2eajyQCR_UbPGmmvHGa4ry5Yg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: libpq heartbeat (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: libpq heartbeat
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Merlin: On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Francisco Olarte > <folarte@peoplecall.com> wrote: >> And I'd like to point libpq sessions does not sound to be the best >> kind of traffic across a firewall, not a good service / protocol to >> expose. > meh -- it's perfectly fine to expose postgres to the internet as long > as you've handled the security concerns. It is, but handling them is not easy, and you have to deal with things like DoS which are not trivial on the server ( as it is a heavy service ). It can be done, and sometimes needs to be done, but is not a thing to take over lightly. > This could be over ssh tunnel for example. In which case it is NOT exposed to the internet. What are you trying to say? Francisco Olarte.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: