Re: bottom / top posting
От | Francisco Olarte |
---|---|
Тема | Re: bottom / top posting |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+bJJbxAG8L2PyPsKpEeh4OMn1Gar=RTz7CxYdpvAFrM54LD+g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: bottom / top posting (Sam Gendler <sgendler@ideasculptor.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: bottom / top posting
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Sam: On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 6:20 PM Sam Gendler <sgendler@ideasculptor.com> wrote: > It could probably be argued that the prohibition was more relevant in the days before 99% of users read their email viaclients which hide quoted content unless it is explicitly expanded. Arguably, smarter digesting software which stripsout unnecessary quotations of earlier posts from beneath top-posted content would be a more effective solution nowthat it is no longer common netiquette (nor all that necessary) to avoid top posting. I, personally, do not have a problem with the space, I use a 4k, gmail collapses it AND stopping reading things like unnecessarily quoted messages, signatures and CO2 emitting eco recomendations to avoid printing as become nearly automatic. My problem is I can understand a message like yours in 5-10 seconds, properly scanning a top posted one takes much longer. So normally I stop reading at the quote and discard the message if I have not understood with what I have read UNLESS it's from my mother or I'm been paid to read it. I find top-posting moderately offensive, like saying "I am not going to waste time to make your reading experience better". Francisco Olarte.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: