Re: BUG #18774: Not the required output of the query used in the function(delete_from_table1) in postgresql9.4
От | Rajni Bobal |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #18774: Not the required output of the query used in the function(delete_from_table1) in postgresql9.4 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+UiKXY60DYXsQZcqNUeQ-V6DRa8T4nS6Db3qYbpsW51iWPveA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #18774: Not the required output of the query used in the function(delete_from_table1) in postgresql9.4 ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #18774: Not the required output of the query used in the function(delete_from_table1) in postgresql9.4
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Hello SIr,
Please clarify about why $1 is not been replaced by 'colname' in delete_from_table2 function.
regards,
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 10:13 PM David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
You seem to have reversed which query you deem correct...On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 8:59 AM Rajni Bobal <rajnibobal@gmail.com> wrote:|| quote_ident(colname)
|| ' IN (SELECT '
|| quote_ident(colname)
|| ' FROM '
|| quote_ident(sel_tblname)This deletes rows from the table depending upon finding the same value in colname in the subquery.' where $1 in (select $1 from ' || quote_ident(sel_tblname) ||This deletes rows from the table depending only upon finding at least one row in the subquery - the limit is basically pointless. Since all rows return the value provided in $1, and $1 = $1.So these indeed produce different results, as they should. The "error" one is behaving exactly as it should. If it doesn't do what you want - which is likely as it is a very unusual query - don't use it.David J.
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: