Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve concurrency of foreign key locking
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve concurrency of foreign key locking |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nMLvV08-T2GBviuDFG2nRE4NRG2XLg0+EZFacT1kwtZg+g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve concurrency of foreign key locking (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve concurrency of foreign
key locking
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve concurrency of foreign key locking |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 23 January 2013 17:15, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2013-01-23 11:58:28 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> >> On 01/23/2013 10:12 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> >Improve concurrency of foreign key locking >> >> This error message change looks rather odd, and has my head spinning a bit: >> >> - errmsg("SELECT FOR UPDATE/SHARE cannot be applied to >> the nullable side of an outer join"))); >> + errmsg("SELECT FOR UPDATE/SHARE/KEY UPDATE/KEY SHARE >> cannot be applied to the nullable side of an outer join"))) >> >> Can't we do better than that? > > I don't really see how? I don't think listing only the current locklevel > really is an improvement and something like "SELECT ... FOR $locktype > cannot .." seem uncommon enough in pg error messages to be strange. > Now I aggree that listing all those locklevels isn't that nice, but I > don't really have a better idea. "row level locks cannot be applied to the NULLable side of an outer join" Hint: there are no rows to lock -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: