Re: Group commit, revised
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Group commit, revised |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nMLvNCL0BTU9ZPnFzVYwB5W_s0pXGYq26qHHXjk0GGp5nQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Group commit, revised (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Group commit, revised
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > I committed this. I ran pgbench test on an 8-core box and didn't see any > slowdown. It would still be good if you get a chance to rerun the bigger > test, but I feel confident that there's no measurable slowdown. I asked clearly and specifically for you to hold back committing anything. Not sure why you would ignore that and commit without actually asking myself or Peter. On a point of principle alone, I think you should revert. Working together is difficult if communication channels are openly ignored and disregarded. Peter and I have been working on a new version that seems likely to improve performance over your suggestions. We should be showing something soon. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: