Re: Enabling Checksums
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Enabling Checksums |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nMLg4C-MOaMS_XoMqRc-7AnWzkOTWep5cZOktJtZs6EBMA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Enabling Checksums (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 19 March 2013 17:18, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote: > I will move back to verifying the page hole, as well. That was agreed long ago... > There are a few approaches: > > 1. Verify that the page hole is zero before write and after read. > 2. Include it in the calculation (if we think there are some corner > cases where the hole might not be all zero). > 3. Zero the page hole before write, and verify that it's zero on read. > This can be done during the memcpy at no performance penalty in > PageSetChecksumOnCopy(), but that won't work for > PageSetChecksumInplace(). > > With option #2 or #3, we might also verify that the hole is all-zero if > asserts are enabled. (3) seems likely to be more expensive than (2), since we're talking unaligned memory writes rather than a single pre-fetchable block read. In any case, at initial patch commit, we should CRC the whole block and allow for the possibility of improvement following measurements. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: