Re: Autonomous subtransactions
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Autonomous subtransactions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nML_TybggzCj+pTFk908WGR1_Ee+a-=edLTV7bZiaLpRdg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Autonomous subtransactions (Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Autonomous subtransactions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 10:28, Gianni Ciolli > <gianni.ciolli@2ndquadrant.it> wrote: >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Autonomous_subtransactions >> >> It is meant to be an ongoing project, requesting comments and >> contributions, rather than a conclusive document. > > In addition to what Jim Nasby said, this proposal seems a bit > inflexible. In particular: > 1. It limits us to exactly 2 autonomous transactions at any time (the > main one and the "subtransaction"). It's not clear to me why you think there would be a limitation to exactly 2 autonomous transactions. The intention would be to have a theoretically unlimited number, subject to resource limits, just as normal subtransactions already do. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: