Re: pg_receivexlog --status-interval add fsync feedback
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_receivexlog --status-interval add fsync feedback |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nMLSXybG8gf_ntSGO4iMmYg6yacjvO+VoF=wBjLmCbcjMg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_receivexlog --status-interval add fsync feedback (<furuyao@pm.nttdata.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_receivexlog --status-interval add fsync feedback
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 17 October 2014 09:55, <furuyao@pm.nttdata.co.jp> wrote: >>A new parameter to send feedback should be called --feedback >>A second parameter to decide whether to fsync should be called --fsync > > I think keep using "--reply-fsync" and "--fsync-interval" is better than make new options. > Thought? We already have hot_standby_feedback, so using the name feedback is best idea. I am suggesting that we send feedback even if we do not fsync, to allow the master to track our progress. Hence the name of the second parameter was just fsync. So both names were suggested because of links to those terms already being used for similar reasons elsewhere in Postgres. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: