Re: detecting binary backup in progress
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: detecting binary backup in progress |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nMLSJA4MsWiGJvW7Y5Ypth02wEu_GN4F=fYoNeYQbeSfuw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: detecting binary backup in progress (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 1 June 2013 15:45, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes: >> The way to resolve this is to have two functions: >> pg_is_in_backup() - which covers both/all kinds of backup >> pg_is_in_exclusive_backup() - which covers just the exclusive backup mode > > What will you do with pg_backup_start_time()? Hmm, at least all of those functions use the "backup" name consistently. I guess I wasn't suggesting we rename pg_start_backup() to pg_start_exclusive_backup(), so maybe it makes sense. pg_start_backup() talks about an online backup, while pg_is_in_backup() talks about an exclusive backup. Minimum change here would be to make pg_start_backup talk about an exclusive backup also. What we need is a function that says whether it is possible to shutdown because of a backup, or not. pg_basebackup is an active task, whereas an exclusive backup never is. So we need a function to tell us that although nothing else is running, but we are running an exclusive backup. So changing pg_is_in_backup() to refer to all kinds of backup still allows it to be used for its primary purpose - to tell whether its OK to shutdown or not, but it also makes it clearer. --Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: