Re: Feature Request: pg_replication_master()
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Feature Request: pg_replication_master() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nMLNmeFMB=9u1Hyj4CPSDzH+SUFzKMbCp6T-DXpmB6OSWA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Feature Request: pg_replication_master() (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 21 December 2012 14:09, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Joshua Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >>> As ever, we spent much energy on debating backwards compatibility >>> rather than just solving the problem it posed, which is fairly easy >>> to >>> solve. >> >> Well, IIRC, the debate was primarily of *your* making. Almost everyone else on the thread was fine with the originalpatch, and it was nearly done for 9.2 before you stepped in. I can't find anyone else on that thread who thoughtthat backwards compatibility was more important than fixing the API. Then you're forgetting the thread. If you reread it you will find I was not alone. > +1. Let's JFDI. Agreed, lets get on with solving the problem rather than continuing a debate that could have been avoided, and can stop any time people choose to let it. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: