Re: WIP: Access method extendability

On 28 October 2014 17:06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> My own thought is that allowing external AMs is simply a natural
> consequence of PG's general approach to extensibility, and it would
> be surprising if we were to decide we didn't want to allow that.

If it wasn't clear from my two earlier attempts, yes, +1 to that.

I'd like to avoid all of the pain by making persistent AMs that are
recoverable after a crash, rather than during crash recovery.

-- Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services