Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nMKy+b6VpckodQDkt2iHXrx3aM3Cm7eZiS0okkg5M2H3sA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 28 December 2012 10:21, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > * There is a fixed 75% heuristic in the patch. I'm concerned that we're doing extra work while holding the buffer locked, which will exacerbate any block contention that exists. We have a list of the columns that the UPDATE is touching since we use that to check column permissions for the UPDATE. Which means we should be able to use that list to check only the columns actually changing in this UPDATE statement. That will likely save us some time during the compression check. Can you look into that please? I don't think it will be much work. I've moved this to the next CF. I'm planning to review this one first. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: