Re: Traffic jams in fn_extra
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Traffic jams in fn_extra |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nMKXFLh5n45KGwGVMzMKvwDxavYePdSqwZp=XCCyawwuBA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Traffic jams in fn_extra (Paul Ramsey <pramsey@cleverelephant.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: Traffic jams in fn_extra
Re: Traffic jams in fn_extra |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 19 November 2013 23:08, Paul Ramsey <pramsey@cleverelephant.ca> wrote: > On the solution, I wasn't suggesting another void* slot, but rather a > slot that holds a hash table, so that an arbitrary number of things > can be stuffed in. Overkill, really, since in 99.9% of times only one > thing would be in there, and in the other 0.1% of times two things. In > our own GenericCacheCollection, we just statically allocate 16 slots. Why do you need to do this dance with fn_extra? It's possible to allocate a hash table in a Transaction-lifetime memory context on first call into a function then cache things there. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: