Re: "Value locking" Wiki page
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "Value locking" Wiki page |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nMKV0zSb1CmJ67fPkoqJDUSTSQgO5vb91BbA5WbW8f4nvQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: "Value locking" Wiki page (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: "Value locking" Wiki page
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 1 October 2014 10:44, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote: > I didn't realize that "promise index tuples" were even seriously discussed. > I guess that can be made to work, too, although I don't see the point. It > wouldn't work with GiST indexes, for the same reasons as page-level locking > won't work (a tuple can legally be inserted anywhere in a GiST index - it > just degrades the index making searching more expensive). And lossy GiST > opclasses are a problem too. GiST doesn't support unique indexes, so it is not in any way a problem. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: