Re: Add shutdown_at_recovery_target option to recovery.conf
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add shutdown_at_recovery_target option to recovery.conf |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nMKPzbkuLvUngb-cT+TwViRHDm9MExPf1j+O5SBgAU6Pfg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Add shutdown_at_recovery_target option to recovery.conf (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Add shutdown_at_recovery_target option to recovery.conf
Re: Add shutdown_at_recovery_target option to recovery.conf |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 19 November 2014 15:57, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2014-11-19 15:47:05 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: >> > Also, for the Shutdown itself, why are we not using >> > kill(PostmasterPid, SIGINT)? >> >> Done > > I don't think that's ok. The postmaster is the one that should be in > control, not some subprocess. > > I fail to see the win in simplicity over using exit (like we already do > for the normal end of recovery!) is. The issue with the log line seems > perfectly easily to avoid by just checking the exit code in > postmaster.c. We need to be able to tell the difference between a crashed Startup process and this usage. As long as we can tell, I don't mind how we do it. Suggestions please. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: