Re: Re: patch submission: truncate trailing nulls from heap rows to reduce the size of the null bitmap [Review]
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: patch submission: truncate trailing nulls from heap rows to reduce the size of the null bitmap [Review] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nMKJw6fEduwb6LZKkiBZAjAe6m7+5boaZFEa6jM5EZyo0Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: patch submission: truncate trailing nulls from heap rows to reduce the size of the null bitmap [Review] (Amit kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: patch submission: truncate trailing nulls from heap rows to reduce the size of the null bitmap [Review]
Re: Re: patch submission: truncate trailing nulls from heap rows to reduce the size of the null bitmap [Review] |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 20 December 2012 14:56, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com> wrote: >> > 1. There is no performance change for cloumns that have all valid >> > values(non- NULLs). I don't see any tests (at all) that measure this. I'm particularly interested in lower numbers of columns, so we can show no regression for the common case. >> > 2. There is a visible performance increase when number of columns >> containing >> > NULLS are more than > 60~70% in table have large number of columns. >> > >> > 3. There are visible space savings when number of columns containing >> NULLS >> > are more than > 60~70% in table have large number of columns. Agreed. I would call that quite disappointing though and was expecting better. Are we sure the patch works and the tests are correct? The lack of any space saving for lower % values is strange and somewhat worrying. There should be a 36? byte saving for 300 null columns in an 800 column table - how does that not show up at all? -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: