Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nMKEh4ZmNf+juynz22XjDDi_C33Es+H4iMRV=bpjQT_VBw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: >> What happens if we shutdown the WALwriter and then issue SIGHUP? > > SIGHUP doesn't affect full_page_writes in that case. Oh, you are concerned about > the case where smart shutdown kills walwriter but some backends are > still running? > Currently SIGHUP affects full_page_writes and running backends use the changed > new value of full_page_writes. But in the patch, SIGHUP doesn't affect... > > To address the problem, we should either postpone the shutdown of walwriter > until all backends have gone away, or leave the update of full_page_writes to > checkpointer process instead of walwriter. Thought? checkpointer seems the correct place to me -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: