Re: Enabling Checksums

On 3 March 2013 18:24, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

> The 16-bit checksum feature seems functional, with two sources of overhead.
> There's some CPU time burned to compute checksums when pages enter the
> system.  And there's extra overhead for WAL logging hint bits.  I'll
> quantify both of those better in another message.

It's crunch time. Do you and Jeff believe this patch should be
committed to Postgres core?

Are there objectors?

-- Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services