Re: So where are we on the open commitfest?
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: So where are we on the open commitfest? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nMKBkNFAcghDvZ547htqSxYqtf_FTjCHEM-hAUs3SVv58w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | So where are we on the open commitfest? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: So where are we on the open commitfest?
Re: So where are we on the open commitfest? Re: So where are we on the open commitfest? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > * Separating bgwriter and checkpointer > > Same for this one. Will commit by end of Monday > * pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp > > This one is stuck because we don't have consensus on whether it should > be applied. I suggest pushing it forward to the next 'fest to give > Simon a reasonable amount of time to come up with a counterproposal. > (At some point, though, we should commit it if he doesn't provide one.) +1 > * unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf > > This one also seems to be lacking consensus more than anything else. > What do we do about that? I'll re-read the thread in detail to see if I can break impasse. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: