Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nMK=SW7XkQo3NpiRtd2n30FN+LLSKXP5bePpqpMwVs2JwA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Sorry, but I still don't really think it's fair to say that you've >>>> proposed a solution to this problem. Or if you have, neither I nor >>>> Fujii Masao understand that proposal well enough to decide whether we >>>> like it. >>> >>> Arguing between trenches doesn't really get us anywhere. >>> >>> As ever, when someone claims to have a better solution then it is up >>> to them to prove that is the case. >> >> So... are you going to do that? > > Simon, could you? If your proposal turns out to be better than mine, I'd be > happy to agree to drop my patch and adopt yours. Yes, will do. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: