Re: Skip checkpoint on promoting from streaming replication
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Skip checkpoint on promoting from streaming replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nMK8gjvWsJo9EvirYvpBa12x7DfW+9xO5T4FuFS1QSLM-w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Skip checkpoint on promoting from streaming replication (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Skip checkpoint on promoting from streaming replication
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 6 January 2013 21:58, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 9 August 2012 10:45, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> On 22 June 2012 05:03, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI >> <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >> >>> I hope this is promising. >> >> I've reviewed this and thought about it over some time. > > I've been torn between the need to remove the checkpoint for speed and > being worried about the implications of doing so. > > We promote in multiple use cases. When we end a PITR, or are > performing a switchover, it doesn't really matter how long the > shutdown checkpoint takes, so I'm inclined to leave it there in those > cases. For failover, we need fast promotion. > > So my thinking is to make pg_ctl promote -m fast > be the way to initiate a fast failover that skips the shutdown checkpoint. > > That way all existing applications work the same as before, while new > users that explicitly choose to do so will gain from the new option. Here's a patch to skip checkpoint when we do pg_ctl promote -m fast We keep the end of recovery checkpoint in all other cases. The only thing left from Kyotaro's patch is a single line of code - the call to ReadCheckpointRecord() that checks to see if the WAL records for the last two restartpoints is on disk, which was an important line of code. Patch implements a new record type XLOG_END_OF_RECOVERY that behaves on replay like a shutdown checkpoint record. I put this back in from my patch because I believe its important that we have a clear place where the WAL history changes timelineId. WAL format change bump required. So far this is only barely tested, but considering time goes on, I thought people might want to pass comment on this. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: