Re: Function Scan costs
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Function Scan costs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nMK6HYz28WfN_Da7uokJ_Lmg46Ngtak63Ai-1W6F7ZAsTA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Function Scan costs (Andy Halsall <halsall_andy@hotmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-novice |
On 27 June 2012 16:56, Andy Halsall <halsall_andy@hotmail.com> wrote: > LOG: duration: 0.497 ms plan: > Query Text: select * from sp_select_by_node_rel($1,$2) > Function Scan on public.sp_select_by_node_rel (cost=0.25..0.26 > rows=1 width=296) (actual time=0.482..0.483 rows=1 loo > ps=1) > Output: tn_type, rel_type, tn_c_state, tn_sort, tn_d_state, > tn_create_order, stn_guid, tsn_guid, tn_gen_perms, tn_au > dit, rel_state, sp_perms, rel_control, prime_key, prime_key_len, sec_key, > sec_key_len, u_prime_key, u_prime_key_len, u_sec_key > , u_sec_key_len > > Function Call: sp_select_by_node_rel(82677::bigint, 71346::bigint) > Buffers: shared hit=6 Seems OK to me. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: