Re: Enabling Checksums
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Enabling Checksums |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nMK5ous2F4W6ZFsqeoCe_tw14nJpwt5J-b0=Sc0ScgEiqg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Enabling Checksums (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Enabling Checksums
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 18 March 2013 19:02, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote: > On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 22:26 -0700, Daniel Farina wrote: >> as long as I am able to turn them off easily > > To be clear: you don't get the performance back by doing > "ignore_checksum_failure = on". You only get around the error itself, > which allows you to dump/reload the good data. Given that the worst pain point comes from setting hint bits during a large SELECT, it makes sense to offer an option to simply skip hint bit setting when we are reading data (SELECT, not INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE). That seems like a useful option even without checksums. I know I have seen cases across many releases where setting that would have been good, since it puts the cleanup back onto VACUUM/writers, rather than occasional SELECTs. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: