Re: [RFC, POC] Don't require a NBuffer sized PrivateRefCount array of local buffer pins
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [RFC, POC] Don't require a NBuffer sized PrivateRefCount array of local buffer pins |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nMK1SoSbWm_i024KMLn+AX_mNm7Z4+bp-93rjp0m9gk0dw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [RFC, POC] Don't require a NBuffer sized PrivateRefCount array of local buffer pins (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [RFC, POC] Don't require a NBuffer sized
PrivateRefCount array of local buffer pins
Re: [RFC, POC] Don't require a NBuffer sized PrivateRefCount array of local buffer pins |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 21 March 2014 14:22, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > That seems to work fairly well. On the few tests I could run on my > laptop - I've done this during a flight - it's a small performance win > in all cases I could test. While saving a fair amount of memory. We've got to the stage now that saving this much memory is essential, so this patch is a must-have. The patch does all I would expect and no more, so approach and details look good to me. Performance? Discussed many years ago, but I suspect the micro-tuning of those earlier patches wasn't as good as it is here. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: