Re: measuring spinning
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: measuring spinning |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nMK0YHdAKs=FAxW0AViCx5U6znTLmQGStBqcZcBvfgo4bQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | measuring spinning (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: measuring spinning
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > Just to whet your appetite, here are the top spinners on a 32-client > SELECT-only test on a 32-core Itanium server. All the locks not shown > below have two orders of magnitude less of a problem than these do. Please can you repeat the test, focusing on minutes 10-30 of a 30 minute test run. That removes much of the noise induced during cache priming. My suggested size of database is one that is 80% size of RAM, with shared_buffers set to 40% of RAM or 2GB whichever is higher. That represents the common case where people know how big their data is and purchase RAM accordingly, then set shared_buffers in line with current wisdom. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: