Re: DeArchiver process
| От | Simon Riggs |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: DeArchiver process |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+U5nMJrcn_fn4z-P=-tV9VyvrReBWf9BSJ-+-=5PgHVoiQVVA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: DeArchiver process (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote: > Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes: >> If we introduce "walrestore" process, pg_standby seems no longer useful. > > pg_standby is one possible restore_command, right? I had understood > that walrestore would be the process that cares for running that > command, not another implementation of it. Yes, that was the idea. > That said, I would really like us to provide a default restore command, > so if you had any intend of handling the restoring command in the > walrestore process, by all means, go ahead :) A different proposal, I think. Not no, just not here and now. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: