Re: Overhead cost of Serializable Snapshot Isolation
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Overhead cost of Serializable Snapshot Isolation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nMJY1rverLx=QN=ZfZg1AVRFAuCeMgkHg7himVMXbc8hPw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Overhead cost of Serializable Snapshot Isolation ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
Ответы |
Re: Overhead cost of Serializable Snapshot Isolation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote: > Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> wrote: > >> "You'll have to retest your apps" just isn't a good answer > > For which major PostgreSQL releases have you recommended that people > deploy their apps without retesting? None. People don't always follow my advice, regrettably. They ask comparative questions like "What is the risk of upgrade?", "How much testing is required?" I never met a customer yet that has an automated test suite designed to stress the accuracy of results under concurrent workloads, so the inability to control the way a new feature operates makes such questions more likely to be given an answer that indicates greater effort and higher risk. That is exactly what I personally would wish to avoid. An off switch encourages people to use new features. It is not a punishment or an admonition to the developer. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: