Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
| От | Simon Riggs |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+U5nMJU-KTGU=5mRbFWz8qQEUeiUZ7M3KxuPs4seQHEA6Kx6g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >> Tatsuo/Josh/Robert also discussed how recovery.conf can be used to >> provide parameters solely for recovery. That is difficult to do >> without causing all downstream tools to make major changes in the ways >> they supply parameters. > > Actually, this case is easily solved by an "include recovery.conf" > parameter. So it's a non-issue. That is what I've suggested and yes, doing that is straightforward. If you mean "do that in a program" if we had a problem with adding parameters, we also have a problem adding an include. We should avoid breaking programs which we have no reason to break. Stability is good, change without purpose is not. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: