Re: HeapTupleHeaderAdvanceLatestRemovedXid doing the wrong thing with multixacts
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: HeapTupleHeaderAdvanceLatestRemovedXid doing the wrong thing with multixacts |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nMJJ4s-CysTBiqXK0YaaPavHn_2McL-ETPXejMf7QdfmRQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: HeapTupleHeaderAdvanceLatestRemovedXid doing the wrong thing with multixacts (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: HeapTupleHeaderAdvanceLatestRemovedXid doing the wrong
thing with multixacts
Re: HeapTupleHeaderAdvanceLatestRemovedXid doing the wrong thing with multixacts |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: >> I just noticed that HeapTupleHeaderAdvanceLatestRemovedXid is comparing Xmax as a TransactionId without verifying whetherit is a multixact or not. Since they advance separately, this could lead to bogus answers. This probably needs tobe fixed. I didn't look into past releases to see if there's a live released bug here or not. > >> I think the fix is simply to ignore the Xmax if the HEAP_XMAX_IS_MULTI bit is set. > >> Additionally I think it should check HEAP_XMAX_INVALID before reading the Xmax at all. > > If it's failing to even check XMAX_INVALID, surely it's completely > broken? Perhaps it assumes its caller has checked all this? HeapTupleHeaderAdvanceLatestRemovedXid() is only ever called when HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum() returns HEAPTUPLE_DEAD, which only happens when HEAP_XMAX_IS_MULTI is not set. I'll add an assert to check this and a comment to explain. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: