Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nM+vNd=10yYUuyNe9uA+Nh9mED=bbsjpU68nUUFT=ZTSVA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10 December 2013 19:54, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > On 12/10/2013 11:49 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> I don't think that anyone believes that not doing block sampling is >> tenable, fwiw. Clearly some type of block sampling would be preferable >> for most or all purposes. > > As discussed, we need math though. Does anyone have an ACM subscription > and time to do a search? Someone must. We can buy one with community > funds, but no reason to do so if we don't have to. We already have that, just use Vitter's algorithm at the block level rather than the row level. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: