Re: BUG #6307: intarray extention gin index does not work with Hot standby
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #6307: intarray extention gin index does not work with Hot standby |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nM+stFo=f_iguAKC=H0+oaTOkK1v4wGJHPop4WtFw6cUFg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #6307: intarray extention gin index does not work with Hot standby (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #6307: intarray extention gin index does not work with
Hot standby
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Maxim Boguk <maxim.boguk@gmail.com> writes: >> I know GIST on intarray[] do not have that problem. >> Very likely the problem is limited to intarray[] GIN indexes only >> (but I going to test some other not-well known GIN indexes tomorrow). > >> Broken FTS indexes on Hot Standby should be known years before. > > You might think that, but you'd be wrong :-(. Yes, that did sound ominous. > ginRedoUpdateMetapage > is failing to restore the contents of the pending-list correctly, > which means this is broken for all types of GIN indexes. =A0Will fix. Great detective work Tom as ever, much appreciated. --=20 =A0Simon Riggs=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 http:/= /www.2ndQuadrant.com/ =A0PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: