Re: Enabling Checksums
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Enabling Checksums |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nM+HEJkgOA2PgmDpYg0-UYxafvvgbV8hbg=MxBZ8pS3TZQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Enabling Checksums (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Enabling Checksums
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 5 December 2012 23:40, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote: >> Or, I could write up a test framework in ruby or python, using the >> appropriate pg driver, and some not-so-portable shell commands to start >> and stop the server. Then, I can publish that on this list, and that >> would at least make it easier to test semi-manually and give greater >> confidence in pre-commit revisions. > > That latter approach is similar to what happened with SSI's isolation > tester. It started out in Python, and then Heikki rewrote it in C. > If Python/Ruby code is massively simpler to write than the C code, > that might be a good way to start out. It'll be an aid to reviewers > even if neither it nor any descendent gets committed. > > Frankly, I think some automated testing harness (written in C or Perl) > that could do fault-injection tests as part of the buildfarm would be > amazingly awesome. I'm drooling just thinking about it. But I guess > that's getting ahead of myself. Agreed, though we can restrict that to a few things at first. * Zeroing pages, making pages all 1s * Transposing pages * Moving chunks of data sideways in a block * Flipping bits randomly * Flipping data endianness * Destroying particular catalog tables or structures etc As a contrib module, so we can be sure to never install it. ;-) -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: