Re: fix bgworkers in EXEC_BACKEND
| От | Simon Riggs |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: fix bgworkers in EXEC_BACKEND |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+U5nM+FNeM1ifs1KfobOnQh0PgdPQzgJdo7_NFUCGr3=+pNLw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: fix bgworkers in EXEC_BACKEND (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 27 December 2012 18:36, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > Simon, > > * Simon Riggs (simon@2ndQuadrant.com) wrote: >> I admire your forward thinking on that; yes, that could cause >> problems. But even then, we would be admitting that nobody now gets a >> valid value of MaxBackends, which sounds like it might be a problem in >> itself. > > I agree that the current implementation could lead to problems/confusion > for contrib module authors, if they're doing something with MaxBackends. I can't see any problems myself and am happy with Heikki's proposal to accept that restriction, since other workarounds are possible. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: