Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nM+E-+UV2X3qrfiFjXFbenxL+aWyNMW0Lfp24qVLnBJ+ug@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation (Amit kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 9 January 2013 08:05, Amit kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com> wrote: > Update patch contains handling of below Comments Thanks > Test results with modified pgbench (1800 record size) on the latest patch: > > -Patch- -tps@-c1- -WAL@-c1- -tps@-c2- -WAL@-c2- > Head 831 4.17 GB 1416 7.13 GB > WAL modification 846 2.36 GB 1712 3.31 GB > > -Patch- -tps@-c4- -WAL@-c4- -tps@-c8- -WAL@-c8- > Head 2196 11.01 GB 2758 13.88 GB > WAL modification 3295 5.87 GB 5472 9.02 GB And test results on normal pgbench? -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: