Re: Sending notifications from the master to the standby
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Sending notifications from the master to the standby |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nM+1TP9MhuzGJ-nTCQWmDdrcSZBG6pA7b97EMwR1NcZymA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Sending notifications from the master to the standby (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Sending notifications from the master to the standby
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> The obvious first use case for this is for cache invalidation. > > Yeah, upthread Simon pointed out that propagating notifies would be > useful for flushing caches in applications that watch the database in a > read-only fashion. I grant that such a use-case is technically possible > within the limitations of a slave server; I'm just dubious that it's a > sufficiently attractive use-case to justify the complexity and future > maintenance costs of the sort of designs we are talking about. Or in > other words: so far, cache invalidation is not the "first" use-case, > it's the ONLY POSSIBLE use-case. That's not useful enough. Many people clearly do think this is useful. I personally don't think it will be that complex. I'm willing to review and maintain it if the patch works the way we want it to. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: